Lobster Elite Two vs Three: is two-line practice worth choosing?

By John Morris · Updated 2026-09-09 · Documentation-based research

Elite Two already covers random width and depth variation. Elite Three adds narrow and wide two-line practice. If alternating forehand and backhand feeds is central to your weekly sessions, that is a concrete reason to choose Three. If you mainly want unpredictable movement around the court, Two already addresses much of that brief.

Options to explore

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. About affiliate links.

DecisionLobster Elite TwoLobster Elite Three
Random width and depthSupportedSupported
Alternating two-lineNot listedNarrow and wide
Hopper and pace150;10–80mph150;10–80mph
Buy forUnpredictable movementRepeatable alternating practice

Random and alternating solve different problems

The Two combines horizontal and vertical random delivery. Three retains the broader movement concept and adds a deliberate alternating pattern at two widths. Random placement makes you respond to an uncertain next location; two-line placement lets you anticipate location while focusing on execution.

Neither pattern is inherently superior. A player rebuilding recovery steps may benefit from a known left-right sequence. A player testing whether a stroke survives less predictable positioning may want random feeds. The choice follows the exercise, rather than a general claim about realism.

Much of the specification stays familiar

Both list a 150-ball hopper, 10–80 mph speed and electronic elevation up to 60 degrees. Their listed weights are 42 lb for Two and 44 lb for Three. The manufacturer does not clearly define battery inclusion within those headline weight figures.

The extra model number should not be read as a major increase in pace or basket size. If those are your priorities, the published specifications do not supply a strong reason to move from Two to Three.

Where the added pattern earns its place

A narrow alternating feed can support repeated transitions between sides without requiring maximal running. A wider pattern lets you enlarge the movement task. You still need to choose appropriate feed timing; alternating positions alone does not create a well-designed workout.

For two players sharing a session, repeatable alternation may also make court organization easier. Decide who hits each ball and where the waiting player stands. That is a practical use of predictable placement, not a promise that buying Three automatically improves the session.

Compare the relevant offers

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. About affiliate links.

What to confirm

Choose Three if two-line work is something you can put in your next training plan. Choose Two if random width and depth meet your needs and you would rarely select fixed alternation. Neither offers the Grand series' custom saved shot sequences.

Check the exact remote and power option as part of the order. Lobster lists internal battery, external battery and electric arrangements across this family, and remote variants differ. A useful comparison matches those packages before assigning value to the additional oscillation feature.

Make your buying decision

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. About affiliate links.

Sources

Continue your research

Find a machine · Plan your complete setup · Tennis ball machine homepage